[personal profile] saint_monkey
60 Minutes had a story last night about the ACLU's attempts to overturn Myriad Genetic's patent on the genes BRCA1 and 2. (When these genes are found (usually in a very specific sub-set of ethnic jews,) they are 82% likely to be an indicator of future breast cancer, and a near 50% indicator of ovarian cancer. The operation of these genes is a clear tie to cancer, and should have been available for broad research by genetecists and oncologists, but they haven't been, because Myriad has "patented" these genes, and aggressively pursues anyone who attempts to work with them.)

Long (long, long) time readers of this blog may remember that I wrote about this (an my anger in the absolute and utter hubris of patenting someone's genetic heritage, and then making them pay for access to the content of their own genome,) in 2003: http://saint-monkey.livejournal.com/92152.html

Although Myriad will appeal, the lower courts have found in favor of the ACLU, and declared Myriad's patent to be invalid.

Of course, there are still those that disagree, but to these people, I want to ask: "Just how much could we have learned about breast cancer, and perhaps cancer in general by now, if this patent had been impossible to obtain, or invalidated back in 2003? Myriad has done what I argued they would do, they've restricted access to this gene (other than their own tests) for seven years, stalling progress in favor of profit.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

saint_monkey

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 08:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios