(no subject)
Oct. 14th, 2003 10:58 pmI was really sick for the last few days, and someone at work thought that it might be to low protien consumption (due tothe fact that my wife and I generally do not eat meat.) Now I'm not one to say that meat eating is wrong, but I think that the amount of meat that americans eat is nowhere close to the amount of protien possibly required by people. I thought i might find some numbers and make a little chart... I used a pure carnivore, a large omnivore, our closest genetic relative, and the average human weight, average daily consumption, and the reported consumption in pounds, or meat by the average american... to come up with a percentage of the diet based entirely in animal protiens... how do we stack up?
So we eat protien like grizzlies, animals which require that they gain almost 400 lbs of excess seasonal fat for hibernation... as it is, our closest genetic relatives only require 4% of their consumption in meat... if this was carried over to humans, we would require a scant .08 pounds of meat per day...
ANIMAL | Avg Weight(lbs) | Consumption/Day total (Lbs) | Meat/Day (lbs) | % of consumption meat |
Human | 134 | 2 | 0.71 | 35.62 |
Chimp | 100 | 4.2 | 0.16 | 3.81% |
Grizzly | 1025 | 90 | 22.50 | 25.00% |
Tiger | 400 | 10 | 10.00 | 100.00% |
So we eat protien like grizzlies, animals which require that they gain almost 400 lbs of excess seasonal fat for hibernation... as it is, our closest genetic relatives only require 4% of their consumption in meat... if this was carried over to humans, we would require a scant .08 pounds of meat per day...